Yes, that's what the DI's call it, here. Every time we Officer Candidates are on our faces for not complying with instructions, or really just on the whim of our class DI, it's called "getting killed". They lovingly call it "the slaughtering of pigs". We're nasty candidates. We're gross and sweaty and many of us are injured or sick.
Why do we do this, one might ask? Every night, (if you're me, then it's every time you're struggling with the push-ups and 60 to 90 leg lifts) we ask this question--absolutely with out a doubt...EVERY NIGHT.
The answer seems to be always the same. We go through this hell by choice, because the outcome is the ability to pin on those shiny bars and choke through the oath that takes us from being nasty candidates to Commissioned Officers in the US Navy.
An update: I am currently in "H" or holding class right now, as I was unfortunate enough to sprain my rotater cuff. Uggh. The blessing is that in "H" I have made a few great friends, one of which just rolled into my old class. Some of the others will be rolling into the next class, 25-09, with me. I am also grateful, as there seemed to be no way for me to compete with--even keep up with, some of the guys in my former class. One is a Navy Seal. Need I say more? Although they scare the piss out of me, I really respect the Marine DI's here. Most of them are Gunnery Sgts., and many will be heading out to Iraq in the next turn of classes. My former DI had the lucky reputation as the most intense and difficult DI of the bunch...we were on our faces, doing push ups and the like, every other second. Not fun. Even though I was crazy scared, like I said, I know he did and does this because he wants us to be the best Naval Officers that can be offered.
I just hope that I am able to support my comrades and progress in the next 13 weeks.
Keep praying for me, guys...I really am depending on these prayers!
Pax et Bonum
CO. Bree Dail, USN
Oh, man...I'd lay money down that this was ALL on the Frogs. Note the name of their vessel--priceless.
LONDON – Nuclear-armed submarines from Britain and France collided in the Atlantic Ocean earlier this month, authorities acknowledged Monday — touching off new concerns about the safety of the world's deep sea missile fleets.
The HMS Vanguard, the oldest vessel in Britain's nuclear-armed submarine fleet, and the French Le Triomphant submarine, which was also carrying nuclear missiles, both suffered minor damage in the collision. No crew members were reported injured.
Britain's most senior sailor, First Sea Lord, Adm. Jonathon Band, said the underwater crash posed no risk to the safety of the submarines' nuclear reactors and nuclear missiles. But he offered no explanation of how the rare incident might have occurred.
"The two submarines came into contact at very low speed," Band said in a statement. "Both submarines remained safe."
France's defense ministry said the ballistic missile submarines had been carrying out routine patrols when they collided.
"They briefly came into contact at a very low speed while submerged. There were no injuries. Neither their nuclear deterrence missions nor their safety were affected," France's defense ministry said Monday in a statement.
Still, the HMS Vanguard was towed back to a submarine base in Scotland with visible dents and scrapes, the BBC reported.
Le Triomphant suffered damaged to a sonar dome but returned under its own power to its base on L'Ile Longue on France's western tip, France said.
Neither France or Britain would confirm the exact date of the collision, but said it took place earlier this month.
The French military had issued a statement Feb 6. saying that one of its submarines had struck a submerged object — "probably a container" — but did not say the Le Triomphant had collided with another vessel.
Britain did not comment on the incident until Monday, after some details were reported by the British media. The defense ministry said the government's usual policy is not to comment on submarine deployments.
Naval experts said they were amazed by the collision.
"This really shouldn't have happened at all," said Stephen Saunders, a retired British Royal Navy commodore and the editor of Jane's Fighting Ships. "It's a very serious incident, and I find it quite extraordinary."
He said while NATO countries let each other know what general area of the Atlantic they are operating in, neither submarine would have had a precise position for the other.
Saunders said submarines don't always turn on their radar systems, or make their presence obvious to other shipping.
"The whole point is to go and hide in a big chunk of ocean and not be found. They tend to go around very slowly and not make much noise," he said.
Some British lawmakers demanded an explanation from Prime Minister Gordon Brown's government.
"(The government) needs to explain how it is possible for a submarine carrying weapons of mass destruction to collide with another submarine carrying weapons of mass destruction in the middle of the world's second-largest ocean," lawmaker Angus Robertson of the opposition Scottish National Party said.
HMS Vanguard came into service in 1993, has a crew of around 140 and typically carries 16 Lockheed Trident D5 missiles. Under government policy, British nuclear submarines carry a maximum of 48 warheads. At least one of Britain's four submarines is on patrol and ready to fire at any given time.
British lawmakers in 2007 approved a 20 billion-pound ($30 billion) program to replace the fleet with new nuclear-armed submarines.
France's Le Triomphant carries 111 crew and 15 nuclear missiles, according to defense analysis group Jane's.
Anti-nuclear groups said the crash should remind the world just how dangerous nuclear submarines really are.
"This reminds us that we could have a new catastrophe with a nuclear submarine at any moment. It is a risk that exists during missions but also in port," said Stephane Lhomme, a spokesman for the French anti-nuclear group Sortir du Nucleaire, "These are mobile nuclear reactors."
Britain's Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament called on Brown to end his country's nuclear submarine patrols of the Atlantic.
"The collision of two submarines, both with nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons onboard, could have released vast amounts of radiation and scattered scores of nuclear warheads across the seabed," the group said.
___
Associated Press Writers Jennifer Quinn in London and Jamey Keaten and Angela Charlton in Paris contributed to this story.
